Samsung ST65 vs Sony A350
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Updated by Sony A380
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Samsung ST65 vs Sony A350 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Samsung ST65 vs Sony A350, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the ST65 (14MP) and the A350 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the ST65 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe ST65 was launched 2 years after the A350 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the ST65 grades versus the A350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung ST65 vs Sony A350 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung ST65 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung ST65 Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony A350
| ST65 | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 | June 2008 | Newer by 32 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Samsung ST65
| A350 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony A350
| ST65 | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung ST65 provides outer dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony A350 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Examine the Samsung ST65 vs Sony A350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the ST65 compared to the A350.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ST65 and A350 is 99 and 62 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The picture underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST65 and A350.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got the exact same megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The ST65 uses the tinier sensor which should make obtaining bokeh more challenging. The newer ST65 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A350 Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST65 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2008-06-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | () | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 674 grams (1.49 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 595 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $130 | $600 |