Samsung ST65 vs Sony A900
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- New Model is Sony A99
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A900 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Samsung ST65 vs Sony A900, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and A900 (25MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) posses different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe ST65 was announced 2 years after the A900 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the ST65 matches up versus the A900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung ST65 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The whole galleries are available at Samsung ST65 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony A900
ST65 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | October 2008 | Newer by 28 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Samsung ST65
A900 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony A900
ST65 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung ST65 provides outer measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony A900 has dimensions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung ST65 vs Sony A900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the ST65 vs the A900.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ST65 and A900 is 99 and 54 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The pic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the ST65 and A900.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The ST65 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A900 will resolve extra detail with its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher ST65 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Samsung ST65 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung ST65 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2011-01-19 | 2008-10-22 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6048 x 4032 |
Highest native ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | () | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 895g (1.97 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | Single | 2 |
Cost at launch | $130 | $2,736 |