Samsung ST65 vs Sony NEX-F3
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
86 Imaging
56 Features
60 Overall
57
Samsung ST65 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-C3
- New Model is Sony NEX-3N
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung ST65 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Samsung ST65 vs Sony NEX-F3, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the ST65 (14MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the ST65 (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ST65 was revealed 19 months prior to the NEX-F3 making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the ST65 scores versus the NEX-F3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung ST65 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung ST65 & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The full galleries are available at Samsung ST65 Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony NEX-F3
| ST65 | NEX-F3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Samsung ST65
| NEX-F3 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 | January 2011 | More modern by 19 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony NEX-F3
| ST65 | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung ST65 features external measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung ST65 vs Sony NEX-F3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the ST65 versus the NEX-F3.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the ST65 and NEX-F3 is 99 and 86 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at specifications. The pic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the ST65 and NEX-F3.
Plainly, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The ST65 using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sony NEX-F3 will give more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged ST65 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung ST65 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung ST65 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2011-01-19 | 2012-08-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | () | - |
| Available lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 314 gr (0.69 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $130 | $470 |