Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6400
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
83 Imaging
68 Features
88 Overall
76
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Expand to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Announced January 2019
Photography Glossary Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6400 Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6400, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe ST65 was brought out 9 years prior to the A6400 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the ST65 scores vs the A6400 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6400 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung ST65 and Sony Alpha a6400. The entire galleries are available at Samsung ST65 Gallery and Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony A6400
| ST65 | A6400 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Samsung ST65
| A6400 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2019 | January 2011 | More recent by 97 months | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony A6400
| ST65 | A6400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung ST65 has physical dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony A6400 has dimensions of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6400 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the ST65 compared to the A6400.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the ST65 and A6400 is 99 and 83 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through technical specs. The visual here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the ST65 and A6400.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The ST65 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A6400 will give extra detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older ST65 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A6400 Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST65 | Sony Alpha a6400 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2011-01-19 | 2019-01-15 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 32000 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 425 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | () | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 11.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 403g (0.89 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 83 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 410 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $130 | $898 |