Samsung ST65 vs Sony HX200V
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
66 Imaging
41 Features
55 Overall
46
Samsung ST65 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Introduced May 2012
- Replaced the Sony HX100V
- Later Model is Sony HX300
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung ST65 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Samsung ST65 versus Sony HX200V, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and HX200V (18MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe ST65 was launched 15 months prior to the HX200V which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the ST65 grades versus the HX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung ST65 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST65 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung ST65 Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony HX200V
| ST65 | HX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Samsung ST65
| HX200V | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 | January 2011 | Fresher by 15 months | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony HX200V
| ST65 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung ST65 enjoys exterior measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has sizing of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung ST65 versus Sony HX200V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the ST65 versus the HX200V.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ST65 and HX200V is 99 and 66 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the ST65 and HX200V.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Sony HX200V to provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older ST65 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung ST65 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-19 | 2012-05-11 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.40 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 583 gr (1.29 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 450 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $130 | $480 |