Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX10
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX10 Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Samsung ST65 versus Sony QX10, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Lens-style by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and QX10 (18MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ST65 was announced 3 years prior to the QX10 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the ST65 matches up vs the QX10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST65 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung ST65 Gallery & Sony QX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony QX10
| ST65 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Samsung ST65
| QX10 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2013 | January 2011 | More modern by 31 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony QX10
| ST65 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST65 provides exterior dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony QX10 has proportions of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Look at the Samsung ST65 versus Sony QX10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the ST65 versus the QX10.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the ST65 and QX10 is 99 and 96 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The image here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the ST65 and QX10.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Sony QX10 to offer more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged ST65 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung ST65 vs Sony QX10 Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2013-09-04 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | - |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1440x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 105g (0.23 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $130 | $250 |