Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX1R II
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
78 Imaging
75 Features
65 Overall
71
Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Introduced October 2015
- Succeeded the Sony RX1R
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX1R II Overview
Following is a extended review of the Samsung ST65 versus Sony RX1R II, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe ST65 was introduced 5 years earlier than the RX1R II which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the ST65 scores against the RX1R II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX1R II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung ST65 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung ST65 Gallery and Sony RX1R II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony RX1R II
| ST65 | RX1R II |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Samsung ST65
| RX1R II | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2015 | January 2011 | More modern by 57 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Crisper display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony RX1R II
| ST65 | RX1R II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST65 has got external dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony RX1R II has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") and a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung ST65 versus Sony RX1R II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the ST65 and the RX1R II.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the ST65 and RX1R II is 99 and 78 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the ST65 and RX1R II.
To sum up, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The ST65 with its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony RX1R II will provide you with extra detail using its extra 28 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged ST65 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung ST65 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
| Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2015-10-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 25600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 50 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 35mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 14cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 507 grams (1.12 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 97 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.9 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 3204 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $130 | $3,300 |