Samsung ST65 vs Sony S2000
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Samsung ST65 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung ST65 vs Sony S2000 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Samsung ST65 versus Sony S2000, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and S2000 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe ST65 was revealed 13 months after the S2000 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the ST65 matches up versus the S2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung ST65 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST65 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung ST65 Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony S2000
| ST65 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 | January 2010 | More modern by 13 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Samsung ST65
| S2000 | ST65 |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony S2000
| ST65 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Samsung ST65 enjoys outside measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has specifications of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung ST65 versus Sony S2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the ST65 against the S2000.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ST65 and S2000 is 99 and 93 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the ST65 and S2000.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung ST65 to offer greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The younger ST65 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung ST65 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-01-19 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $130 | $225 |