Samsung ST65 vs Sony TX200V
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Samsung ST65 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung ST65 vs Sony TX200V Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Samsung ST65 vs Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ST65 was unveiled 12 months before the TX200V so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the ST65 grades vs the TX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung ST65 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung ST65 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are available at Samsung ST65 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony TX200V
| ST65 | TX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Samsung ST65
| TX200V | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 12 months |
| Screen size | 3.3" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony TX200V
| ST65 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST65 provides physical measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has proportions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Samsung ST65 vs Sony TX200V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the ST65 versus the TX200V.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ST65 and TX200V is 99 and 96 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing specs. The pic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the ST65 and TX200V.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Sony TX200V to provide you with greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged ST65 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung ST65 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST65 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 129g (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $130 | $500 |
