Samsung ST65 vs Sony A99
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
57 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 812g - 147 x 111 x 78mm
- Revealed December 2012
- Superseded the Sony A900
- Replacement is Sony A99 II
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A99 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Samsung ST65 vs Sony A99, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the ST65 (14MP) and A99 (24MP) and the ST65 (1/2.3") and A99 (Full frame) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ST65 was released 23 months earlier than the A99 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A99 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the ST65 matches up versus the A99 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A99 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung ST65 and Sony SLT-A99. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung ST65 Gallery and Sony A99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Sony A99
ST65 | A99 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A99 over the Samsung ST65
A99 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | January 2011 | More modern by 23 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer screen (+769k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung ST65 and Sony A99
ST65 | A99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A99 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung ST65 features external dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony A99 has sizing of 147mm x 111mm x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 812 grams (1.79 lbs).
Compare the Samsung ST65 vs Sony A99 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the ST65 compared to the A99.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the ST65 and A99 is 99 and 57 respectively.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A99 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST65 and A99.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The ST65 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A99 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged ST65 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST65 vs Sony A99 Specifications
Samsung ST65 | Sony SLT-A99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung ST65 | Sony SLT-A99 |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2011-01-19 | 2012-12-12 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 19 |
Cross focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | () | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 812 gr (1.79 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 147 x 111 x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 89 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1555 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo; SD, SDHC and SDXC |
Storage slots | One | Dual |
Cost at launch | $130 | $1,998 |