Samsung ST6500 vs Samsung ST95
99 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Samsung ST6500 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Samsung ST6500 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Samsung ST6500 versus Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact cameras and both are created by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the ST6500 (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is very close and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ST6500 was brought out very close to the ST95 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the ST6500 matches up versus the ST95 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung ST6500 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung ST6500 and Samsung ST95. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung ST6500 Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Samsung ST95
ST6500 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Samsung ST6500
ST95 | ST6500 |
---|
Common features in the Samsung ST6500 and Samsung ST95
ST6500 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | January 2011 | Same generation | |
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung ST6500 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST6500 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Samsung ST6500 versus Samsung ST95 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the ST6500 vs the ST95.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ST6500 and ST95 is 99 and 99 respectively.
Samsung ST6500 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The picture here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the ST6500 and ST95.
All in all, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of files however you need to consider the release date of the cameras into account.
Samsung ST6500 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST6500 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Samsung ST6500 | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung ST6500 | Samsung ST95 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2011-01-19 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | () |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Dimensions | 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | - | $145 |