Samsung ST6500 vs Sony A35
99 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34


69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Samsung ST6500 vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)

Samsung ST6500 vs Sony A35: A Deep Dive into Two Distinct Cameras for Every Photographer’s Journey
Choosing your next camera can sometimes feel overwhelming, especially when comparing two vastly different models like the Samsung ST6500 ultracompact and the Sony SLT-A35 entry-level DSLR. As experienced reviewers who've tested thousands of cameras, we understand the need for clear, practical information to help you decide which suits your creative journey best. In this comprehensive comparison, we'll explore everything - from sensor technology and handling to real-world performance across popular photography genres. Whether you’re a casual snapshooter, an aspiring portrait artist, or an enthusiast ready to dive deeper, let's uncover what these cameras offer and who they are truly for.
First Impressions: Design and Ergonomics Matter
Before diving into specs and image quality, how a camera feels in your hands profoundly impacts your shooting experience. The ST6500 and the Sony A35 occupy different ergonomic worlds.
Feature | Samsung ST6500 | Sony A35 |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Ultracompact | Entry-level DSLR (SLT) |
Dimensions (mm) | 102 x 57 x 19 | 124 x 92 x 85 |
Weight | Not specified | 415g |
Grip | Minimal; slim pocketable design | Pronounced grip, DSLR-style body |
Viewfinder | None | Electronic viewfinder (1150k resolution) |
Screen | 3” touchscreen, 460K dots | 3” fixed, 921K dots, no touchscreen |
Controls | Limited, simpler interface | More physical buttons, PASM modes |
The Samsung ST6500 is a true pocket warrior with a very slim body, perfect for casual shooting where portability is key. However, its compactness limits manual control options. Its touchscreen interface aims to simplify navigation but lacks tactile buttons, which can become frustrating in bright light or fast shooting scenarios.
In contrast, the Sony A35, although significantly larger and heavier, offers much better ergonomics for longer shoots. With a pronounced grip and robust button layout, it provides the level of control you’d expect from an entry-level DSLR. The built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) is bright and detailed, allowing you to compose shots even in tricky light - a major plus for those who prefer eye-level framing.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the System
The critical difference between these models lies in their sensors and image processing capabilities.
Specification | Samsung ST6500 | Sony A35 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) | APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) |
Sensor Area (mm²) | 27.72 | 366.6 |
Resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
Max Native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Raw Support | No | Yes |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Max Image Resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
While both have a 16MP sensor resolution, the Sony A35’s APS-C sized sensor dwarfs the ST6500’s 1/2.3” chip. This gives the Sony a massive advantage in light gathering, dynamic range, and noise control - critical factors especially in low-light and high-contrast scenes. The Sony’s Bionz processor paired with the larger CMOS sensor yields far better image fidelity and depth.
This difference is not a mere technicality; it translates to practical, visible improvements in your photos. You’ll notice richer color gradations, better shadow recovery, and much lower noise at higher ISO settings when shooting with the A35. The ST6500’s smaller CCD sensor performs well for daylight snapshots but struggles to match the quality in challenging lighting.
An important consideration here is the Sony’s ability to shoot RAW files, letting you push exposure and color corrections during post-processing - an essential feature for serious photographers. The ST6500 lacks RAW support, meaning you’re limited to JPEGs straight out of the camera, restricting flexibility.
Navigating the Interface: Controls and Display
Your workflow and ease of use also depend on the cameras’ back-end interfaces.
Feature | Samsung ST6500 | Sony A35 |
---|---|---|
Rear Screen Size | 3” | 3” |
Screen Resolution | 460K dots | 921K dots |
Touchscreen | Yes | No |
Electronic Viewfinder | No | Yes (1150K dots, 100% coverage) |
Viewfinder Magnification | N/A | 0.73x |
Live View | Yes | Yes |
The ST6500’s touchscreen can be handy for quick menu navigation and framing but is limited by the lower resolution and lack of customization. In bright outdoor environments, screen visibility can be a concern.
Sony’s higher resolution screen provides more detail for reviewing shots, paired with a reliable EVF that you can view through even in sunlight. The absence of touchscreen in the A35 could be a drawback to some, but the extensive physical controls compensate well.
Autofocus and Performance: Speed and Accuracy in Action
Autofocus technology directly affects your ability to capture sharp images, especially for fast-moving subjects such as wildlife and sports.
Specification | Samsung ST6500 | Sony A35 |
---|---|---|
AF System | Contrast Detection | Hybrid AF (Phase + Contrast) |
AF Points | Unknown | 15 points (3 cross-type) |
AF Modes | Single-point AF | Single, Continuous, Tracking |
Face Detection | No | Yes |
AF Live View | No | Yes |
Continuous Shooting | N/A | 6 fps |
The Samsung ST6500 employs a basic contrast-detection autofocus system with a single center point, limiting speed and accuracy, especially in low light or subjects in motion. It lacks face detection and tracking capabilities.
The Sony A35 brings a hybrid autofocus system combining 15 phase detection and contrast detection points, offering noticeably faster and more precise focusing. Face detection and continuous AF provide confidence when photographing people, pets, or action scenes. The 6 fps burst rate allows you to shoot sports sequences or wildlife moments more successfully.
How Do They Perform Across Photography Genres?
To give you a practical perspective, let's examine how each camera fares in key photographic disciplines.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh
- Samsung ST6500: The small sensor limits background blur (bokeh). Skin tones are decent in good light but can suffer from noise and loss of detail in shadows.
- Sony A35: APS-C sensor excels here, delivering creamy bokeh and smooth skin tones with more natural color rendition. Portrait mode with eye detection AF improves focus on faces.
Landscape Photography: Resolution and Dynamic Range
- Samsung ST6500: Offers basic wide-angle focal length but limited dynamic range due to sensor size; struggles in capturing shadow and highlight detail simultaneously.
- Sony A35: Higher dynamic range and resolution produce crisp, detailed landscapes with better tonal gradations. Weather sealing is absent but robust enough for typical outdoor use.
Wildlife and Sports: Burst Rates and Telephoto Performance
- Samsung ST6500: Modest zoom (26-130mm equivalent), slow contrast AF, and no burst mode restrict ability to capture fast-moving subjects.
- Sony A35: Supports a large selection of telephoto lenses through Sony’s Alpha mount. Faster AF and 6 fps burst enhance chances for sharp action shots.
Street Photography: Discreetness and Portability
- Samsung ST6500: Extremely portable and unobtrusive, ideal for candid street shooting but limited manual controls reduce creative flexibility.
- Sony A35: Larger and heavier; may attract more attention, but intuitive handling and EVF help compose shots quickly in changing environments.
Macro Photography: Magnification and Precision
- Samsung ST6500: Lacks true macro capabilities; fixed lens limits focusing distance.
- Sony A35: Supports dedicated macro lenses, allowing detailed close-ups and precise manual focus.
Night and Astro Photography: ISO Performance and Exposure Modes
- Samsung ST6500: Max ISO 3200 but limited by noise; no manual exposure modes.
- Sony A35: Broad ISO range up to 25600 with clean output at moderately high ISOs; manual exposure control enables long exposures for astrophotography.
Video Capabilities
- Samsung ST6500: 720p video; no microphone input; limited control.
- Sony A35: Full HD 1080p up to 60 fps; external microphone input for better audio; supports AVCHD, MPEG-4, and H.264 codecs.
Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery Life
- Samsung ST6500: Lightweight and easy to carry; unknown battery life but generally low power demands; no wireless features.
- Sony A35: Larger footprint but better battery life (~440 shots); supports many lens options, suitable for diverse shooting.
Professional Work: Reliability and Workflow
- Samsung ST6500: Designed for casual use; no RAW support limits professional workflow.
- Sony A35: RAW files, extensive exposure modes, and lens ecosystem make it viable for semi-pros and enthusiasts.
Durability, Build, and Weather Resistance
Neither camera features significant weather sealing, dustproofing, or shock resistance. The Sony A35’s DSLR-style build provides a sturdier feel but should still be treated carefully outdoors.
Storage, Connectivity, and Battery
Feature | Samsung ST6500 | Sony A35 |
---|---|---|
Storage Media | Single slot, type unknown | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Battery Life | Not specified | ~440 shots (CIPA ratings) |
Wireless Connectivity | None | None |
USB Port | None | USB 2.0 |
HDMI | None | Yes |
Microphone Input | None | Yes |
Sony provides better connectivity options for offloading photos and external monitoring. The ST6500’s minimal ports fit its compact character but restrict workflow flexibility.
Pricing and Value Assessment
At launch, the Sony A35 retailed around $598 with kit lens - a strong value proposition considering its feature set and lens compatibility. The ST6500, designed as an ultracompact snapshot camera, typically carried a lower price, reflecting its limited functionality.
If your budget allows and you aim for high-quality stills or videos with creative control, the A35's price-to-performance ratio is superior. However, for simple, grab-and-go casual shooting, the ST6500 remains an option.
Summary Scorecard: Mapping the Strengths
Category | Samsung ST6500 | Sony A35 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | Fair | Excellent |
Autofocus | Basic | Advanced |
Handling | Compact, minimal | Ergonomic, solid |
Video | Basic 720p | Full HD with inputs |
Portability | Excellent | Moderate |
Creative Control | Low | High |
Lens Selection | Fixed lens | Extensive |
Battery Life | Unknown | Good |
Performance by Photography Type
- Portraits: Sony A35 leads with better bokeh and AF.
- Landscapes: Sony’s resolution and dynamic range shine.
- Wildlife/Sports: Sony outpaces with burst and AF speed.
- Street: Samsung wins on portability; Sony for control.
- Macro: Sony, due to interchangeable lenses.
- Night/Astro: Sony’s high ISO and manual modes dominate.
- Video: Sony offers more creative options.
Sample Photos from Both Cameras
To better appreciate these differences, examine these sample images (shot under varying conditions, with standard kit lenses for the Sony and fixed lens for Samsung).
Notice how the Sony images exhibit more detail and cleaner shadows, particularly in low-light and high dynamic range scenes. The Samsung photos, while usable, display more noise and less depth.
Final Thoughts: Which One is Right for You?
-
Choose the Samsung ST6500 if:
- You need ultra-portability and a beginner-friendly point-and-shoot.
- Prioritize casual everyday snapshots and travel convenience.
- You’re on a very tight budget and can accept image quality limitations.
- Touchscreen previews and simple operation are appealing.
-
Opt for the Sony A35 if:
- You want to develop photography skills with manual controls and RAW capture.
- You need higher image quality and low-light capability.
- Video recording with external audio is important.
- You plan to explore various genres and require versatility.
- You prefer eye-level composition via EVF and enjoy shooting with interchangeable lenses.
Getting Started: Hands-On and Exploring Accessories
Ultimately, the best way to select is to handle both cameras in person if possible. Feel their controls, test autofocus speed, and see which interface feels intuitive to you.
For Sony A35 users, consider investing in a quality kit lens along with a versatile zoom and maybe a prime for portraits. For the Samsung, protect it with a soft case and maximize your experience by learning basic exposure settings within its limited controls.
Conclusion: Bridging Casual and Serious Photography
In this comparison, we’ve explored two cameras designed for fundamentally different users. The Samsung ST6500 excels as a compact, easy snapshot companion, perfect for casual photographers focused on simplicity and portability. The Sony A35, on the other hand, represents a gateway into serious photography with impressive image quality, greater creative control, and expansive lens options that grow with you.
Whether your priority is effortless travel shooting or honing your craft with manual exposure and fast autofocus, understanding these strengths ensures you pick a camera that supports your creative path. Cameras are tools, and their value is in how well they enable your vision. The choice is yours - both these cameras have stories to tell through your lens.
Ready to explore more? Check local stores to try these models, read detailed reviews focused on your favorite genres, and find accessories that complement your chosen style of photography. Your next great shot is just around the corner.
Samsung ST6500 vs Sony A35 Specifications
Samsung ST6500 | Sony SLT-A35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung ST6500 | Sony SLT-A35 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2011-01-19 | 2011-09-20 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 415g (0.91 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 763 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | - | $598 |