Samsung ST700 vs Samsung ST95
99 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Samsung ST700 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
Samsung ST700 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Samsung ST700 vs Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact digital cameras and both of them are built by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the ST700 (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ST700 was released about the same time to the ST95 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the ST700 matches up against the ST95 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung ST700 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung ST700 & Samsung ST95. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung ST700 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Samsung ST95
ST700 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Samsung ST700
ST95 | ST700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST700 and Samsung ST95
ST700 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | January 2011 | Similar age | |
Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Samsung ST700 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung ST700 offers outer measurements of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Samsung ST700 vs Samsung ST95 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the ST700 and the ST95.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ST700 and ST95 is 99 and 99 respectively.
Samsung ST700 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the ST700 and ST95.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photos though you would want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration.
Samsung ST700 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST700 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Samsung ST700 | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung ST700 | Samsung ST95 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | - | - |
Min native ISO | - | - |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | () |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Physical dimensions | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Time lapse feature | ||
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $280 | $145 |