Samsung ST90 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Samsung ST90 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Launched April 2012
- Succeeded the Sigma SD1
Samsung ST90 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Samsung ST90 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the ST90 (14MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty close but the ST90 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ST90 was brought out 14 months earlier than the SD1 Merrill which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST90 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the ST90 grades against the SD1 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung ST90 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST90 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The entire galleries are available at Samsung ST90 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST90 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
ST90 | SD1 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung ST90
SD1 Merrill | ST90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2012 | January 2011 | Fresher by 14 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Samsung ST90 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
ST90 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Samsung ST90 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST90 has physical dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
See the Samsung ST90 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the ST90 compared to the SD1 Merrill.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the ST90 and SD1 Merrill is 99 and 57 respectively.
Samsung ST90 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The graphic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the ST90 and SD1 Merrill.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The ST90 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will render more detail having its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older ST90 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung ST90 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST90 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung ST90 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung ST90 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2011-01-19 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | () | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 790 grams (1.74 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $150 | $2,339 |