Samsung ST93 vs Samsung ST95
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Samsung ST93 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released April 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
Samsung ST93 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Samsung ST93 versus Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact digital cameras and both of them are designed by Samsung. The image resolution of the ST93 (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ST93 was brought out 4 months after the ST95 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the ST93 matches up against the ST95 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung ST93 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung ST93 and Samsung ST95. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung ST93 Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Samsung ST95
ST93 | ST95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Samsung ST93
ST95 | ST93 |
---|
Common features in the Samsung ST93 and Samsung ST95
ST93 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2011 | January 2011 | Similar generation | |
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Samsung ST93 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST93 comes with outer dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Samsung ST93 versus Samsung ST95 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the ST93 vs the ST95.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ST93 and ST95 is 97 and 99 respectively.
Samsung ST93 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST93 and ST95.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you should expect similar quality of files however you have to factor the production date of the products into consideration.
Samsung ST93 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST93 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Samsung ST93 | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung ST93 | Samsung ST95 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2011-04-20 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | () |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 110g (0.24 lbs) | - |
Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | - | $145 |