Samsung ST93 vs Sigma Quattro
97 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung ST93 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed April 2011
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung ST93 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Samsung ST93 vs Sigma Quattro, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the ST93 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the ST93 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ST93 was released 5 years earlier than the Quattro which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the ST93 scores vs the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung ST93 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST93 and Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung ST93 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Sigma Quattro
| ST93 | Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung ST93
| Quattro | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | April 2011 | Newer by 59 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 460k | Sharper screen (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST93 and Sigma Quattro
| ST93 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Samsung ST93 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Samsung ST93 has got physical measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Examine the Samsung ST93 vs Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the ST93 vs the Quattro.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the ST93 and Quattro is 97 and 63 respectively.
Samsung ST93 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading a spec sheet. The image below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the ST93 and Quattro.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The ST93 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged ST93 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Samsung ST93 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung ST93 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Samsung ST93 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model type | Samsung ST93 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2011-04-20 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | () | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.8 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 110g (0.24 pounds) | 625g (1.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | - | $738 |