Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB2200F
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Introduced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Lets look closer at the Samsung ST95 versus Samsung WB2200F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Samsung. The image resolution of the ST95 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is pretty similar and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ST95 was announced 4 years earlier than the WB2200F which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the ST95 scores against the WB2200F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST95 & Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung ST95 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Samsung WB2200F
| ST95 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Samsung ST95
| WB2200F | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 36 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Samsung WB2200F
| ST95 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung ST95 enjoys physical measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung ST95 versus Samsung WB2200F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the ST95 against the WB2200F.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the ST95 and WB2200F is 99 and 59 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The image below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the ST95 and WB2200F.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution so you can expect similar quality of files but you should take the age of the products into consideration. The more aged ST95 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Samsung ST95 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung ST95 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dots |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 708 gr (1.56 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP-1410 |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $145 | $599 |
