Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed December 2010
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the ST95 (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe ST95 was announced about the same time to the WB700 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the ST95 scores versus the WB700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung ST95 and Samsung WB700. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung ST95 Gallery and Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Samsung WB700
ST95 | WB700 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Samsung ST95
WB700 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Samsung WB700
ST95 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | December 2010 | Similar generation | |
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung ST95 has got external measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the ST95 and the WB700.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the ST95 and WB700 is 99 and 98 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the ST95 and WB700.
Clearly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung ST95 to resolve greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively.
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Samsung ST95 | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung ST95 | Samsung WB700 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-01-19 | 2010-12-28 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | - | - |
Lowest native ISO | - | - |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | () |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $145 | $300 |