Clicky

Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700

Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31
Samsung ST95 front
 
Samsung WB700 front
Portability
98
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs

Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Released January 2011
Samsung WB700
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
  • Revealed December 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the ST95 (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The ST95 was announced about the same time to the WB700 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the ST95 scores versus the WB700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Samsung WB700

 ST95 WB700 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Samsung ST95

 WB700 ST95 
Display resolution614k460kSharper display (+154k dot)

Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Samsung WB700

 ST95 WB700 
RevealedJanuary 2011December 2010Similar generation
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung ST95 has got external measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Look at the Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the ST95 and the WB700.

Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the ST95 and WB700 is 99 and 98 respectively.

Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison

Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the ST95 and WB700.

Clearly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung ST95 to resolve greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively.

Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison

Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung ST95
Portrait photography with Samsung WB700
30
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
30
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Samsung ST95 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB700 Street photography highlights
50
no moving screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
max ISO too low (0)
49
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
max ISO too low (0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Samsung ST95 Sports photography features
Samsung WB700 Sports photography features
27
resolution is good (16MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
28
good megapixels (14MP)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Samsung ST95 Travel photography advice
Samsung WB700 Travel photography advice
71
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
great max aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
70
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
good max aperture (f)
no Timelapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung ST95
Landscape photography with Samsung WB700
38
great max aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
resolution is good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
38
good max aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
good megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
does not have RAW files
no Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung ST95 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB700 as a Vlogging camera
27
great max aperture (f)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
27
good max aperture (f)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung ST95 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung ST95 and Samsung WB700
 Samsung ST95Samsung WB700
General Information
Brand Samsung Samsung
Model type Samsung ST95 Samsung WB700
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2011-01-19 2010-12-28
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.16 x 4.62mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO - -
Lowest native ISO - -
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range () ()
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 460 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format - H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Physical dimensions 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Time lapse recording
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $145 $300