Samsung ST95 vs Sony A9
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
65 Imaging
72 Features
93 Overall
80
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Raise to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
- Introduced April 2017
- Replacement is Sony A9 II
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung ST95 vs Sony A9 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Samsung ST95 and Sony A9, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Samsung and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the ST95 (16MP) and A9 (24MP) and the ST95 (1/2.3") and A9 (Full frame) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe ST95 was brought out 7 years earlier than the A9 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A9 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the ST95 matches up versus the A9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung ST95 vs Sony A9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung ST95 & Sony Alpha A9. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung ST95 Gallery & Sony A9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sony A9
| ST95 | A9 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 over the Samsung ST95
| A9 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2017 | January 2011 | More modern by 76 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1440k | 460k | Sharper display (+980k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sony A9
| ST95 | A9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A9 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung ST95 has got external dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony A9 has dimensions of 127mm x 96mm x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") and a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs).
Compare the Samsung ST95 and Sony A9 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the ST95 compared to the A9.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the ST95 and A9 is 99 and 65 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A9 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The image below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST95 and A9.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The ST95 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A9 will produce greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged ST95 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A9 Specifications
| Samsung ST95 | Sony Alpha A9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST95 | Sony Alpha A9 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Pro Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2017-04-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 847.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 51200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 693 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | () | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 1,440k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 20.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 673g (1.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 92 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3517 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FZ100 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
| Storage slots | Single | Two |
| Price at launch | $145 | $4,498 |