Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
83 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Superseded the Sony A6000
- New Model is Sony A6500
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the ST95 (16MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the ST95 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ST95 was introduced 6 years prior to the A6300 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the ST95 scores versus the A6300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung ST95 & Sony Alpha a6300. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung ST95 Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sony A6300
| ST95 | A6300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Samsung ST95
| A6300 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | January 2011 | Newer by 61 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sony A6300
| ST95 | A6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung ST95 has external dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony A6300 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
See the Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the ST95 and the A6300.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ST95 and A6300 is 99 and 83 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST95 and A6300.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The ST95 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A6300 will offer extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged ST95 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
| Samsung ST95 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung ST95 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2011-01-19 | 2016-02-03 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | - | 25600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
| Min native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 425 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | () | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 11.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | - | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 404 gr (0.89 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 85 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1437 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $145 | $889 |