Clicky

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300

Portability
99
Imaging
38
Features
19
Overall
30
Samsung ST95 front
 
Sony Alpha a6300 front
Portability
83
Imaging
66
Features
82
Overall
72

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs

Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Sony A6300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
  • Introduced February 2016
  • Superseded the Sony A6000
  • New Model is Sony A6500
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Overview

In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the ST95 (16MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the ST95 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The ST95 was introduced 6 years prior to the A6300 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the ST95 scores versus the A6300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sony A6300

 ST95 A6300 

Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Samsung ST95

 A6300 ST95 
IntroducedFebruary 2016January 2011Newer by 61 months
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution922k460kClearer screen (+462k dot)

Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sony A6300

 ST95 A6300 
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung ST95 has external dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony A6300 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).

See the Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the ST95 and the A6300.

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ST95 and A6300 is 99 and 83 respectively.

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST95 and A6300.

Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The ST95 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A6300 will offer extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged ST95 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung ST95 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A6300 as a Portrait photography camera
29
good resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
79
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung ST95
Street photography with Sony A6300
50
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
low max ISO (0)
79
screen tilts
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
very good ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Samsung ST95 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A6300 as a Sports photography camera
27
good resolution (16 megapixels)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
74
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung ST95
Travel photography with Sony A6300
71
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fast max aperture (f)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
76
environment sealing
megapixel count decent (24MP)
built-in flash
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Samsung ST95 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A6300 as a Landscape photography camera
37
fast max aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
good resolution (16MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
no RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
79
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung ST95 Vlogging details
Sony A6300 Vlogging details
27
fast max aperture (f)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone socket
35
includes face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes external microphone port
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Samsung ST95 vs Sony A6300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung ST95 and Sony A6300
 Samsung ST95Sony Alpha a6300
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sony
Model Samsung ST95 Sony Alpha a6300
Class Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2011-01-19 2016-02-03
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.16 x 4.62mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.5mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO - 25600
Max enhanced ISO - 51200
Min native ISO - 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 425
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range () -
Number of lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 11.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings - Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 404 gr (0.89 lb)
Dimensions 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 85
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1437
Other
Battery life - 400 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse recording With downloadable app
Storage media - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch price $145 $889