Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX100
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
92 Imaging
50 Features
44 Overall
47
Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX100 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX100, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Lens-style by rivals Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the ST95 (16MP) and the QX100 (20MP) is pretty comparable but the ST95 (1/2.3") and QX100 (1") offer different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe ST95 was brought out 3 years before the QX100 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the ST95 grades against the QX100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST95 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100. The entire galleries are available at Samsung ST95 Gallery and Sony QX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sony QX100
| ST95 | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Samsung ST95
| QX100 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 32 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sony QX100
| ST95 | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung ST95 enjoys exterior measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony QX100 has measurements of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX100 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the ST95 compared to the QX100.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the ST95 and QX100 is 99 and 92 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The visual here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the ST95 and QX100.
All in all, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The ST95 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sony QX100 will produce more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older ST95 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX100 Specifications
| Samsung ST95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Lens-style |
| Released | 2011-01-19 | 2013-09-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 160 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | - |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | None |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $145 | $268 |