Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX30
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
91 Imaging
44 Features
37 Overall
41
Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Announced September 2014
Photography Glossary Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX30 Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Samsung ST95 and Sony QX30, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Lens-style by brands Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the ST95 (16MP) and the QX30 (20MP) is very well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ST95 was revealed 4 years earlier than the QX30 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the ST95 matches up versus the QX30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX30 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung ST95 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung ST95 Gallery and Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sony QX30
| ST95 | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 0k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Samsung ST95
| QX30 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 | January 2011 | More modern by 44 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sony QX30
| ST95 | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung ST95 comes with exterior dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony QX30 has specifications of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Samsung ST95 and Sony QX30 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the ST95 and the QX30.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ST95 and QX30 is 99 and 91 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The pic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the ST95 and QX30.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Sony QX30 to give you extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged ST95 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Samsung ST95 vs Sony QX30 Specifications
| Samsung ST95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2014-09-03 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | - |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $145 | $348 |