Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX100 VII
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
88 Imaging
54 Features
78 Overall
63
Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX100 VII Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 302g - 102 x 58 x 43mm
- Announced July 2019
- Superseded the Sony RX100 VI
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX100 VII Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Samsung ST95 versus Sony RX100 VII, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the ST95 (16MP) and the RX100 VII (20MP) is pretty close but the ST95 (1/2.3") and RX100 VII (1") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ST95 was introduced 9 years earlier than the RX100 VII which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX100 VII being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the ST95 grades vs the RX100 VII in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX100 VII Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST95 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung ST95 Gallery & Sony RX100 VII Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sony RX100 VII
| ST95 | RX100 VII |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VII over the Samsung ST95
| RX100 VII | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2019 | January 2011 | More modern by 103 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sony RX100 VII
| ST95 | RX100 VII | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX100 VII Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST95 features external measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony RX100 VII has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") and a weight of 302 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check out the Samsung ST95 versus Sony RX100 VII in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the ST95 versus the RX100 VII.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ST95 and RX100 VII is 99 and 88 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX100 VII Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The image below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the ST95 and RX100 VII.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The ST95 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony RX100 VII will result in extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged ST95 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX100 VII Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung ST95 vs Sony RX100 VII Specifications
| Samsung ST95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII |
| Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2019-07-25 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | - | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 20.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.90 m (at Auto ISO) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 302 gr (0.67 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 418 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $145 | $1,298 |