Samsung ST95 vs Sony S950
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Samsung ST95 vs Sony S950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Released February 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung ST95 vs Sony S950 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Samsung ST95 vs Sony S950, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the ST95 (16MP) and S950 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ST95 was manufactured 24 months after the S950 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony S950 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the ST95 grades vs the S950 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung ST95 vs Sony S950 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung ST95 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung ST95 Gallery and Sony S950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Sony S950
| ST95 | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 | February 2009 | Newer by 24 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S950 over the Samsung ST95
| S950 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Sony S950
| ST95 | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Sony S950 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung ST95 has got outside measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony S950 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Samsung ST95 vs Sony S950 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the ST95 against the S950.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ST95 and S950 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony S950 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the ST95 and S950.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung ST95 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger ST95 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Samsung ST95 vs Sony S950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung ST95 vs Sony S950 Specifications
| Samsung ST95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung ST95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-19 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 167g (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $145 | $130 |