Samsung ST95 vs Zeiss ZX1
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30


67 Imaging
77 Features
62 Overall
71
Samsung ST95 vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Announced September 2018

Samsung ST95 vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Samsung ST95 versus Zeiss ZX1, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Zeiss. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the ST95 (16MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the ST95 (1/2.3") and ZX1 (Full frame) offer different sensor measurements.

The ST95 was revealed 8 years before the ZX1 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the ST95 matches up vs the ZX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung ST95 vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung ST95 and Zeiss ZX1. The full galleries are available at Samsung ST95 Gallery and Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Zeiss ZX1
ST95 | ZX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Samsung ST95
ZX1 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 93 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 4.34" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.34") |
Screen resolution | 2765k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+2305k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung ST95 and Zeiss ZX1
ST95 | ZX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung ST95 vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung ST95 features outside dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Zeiss ZX1 has proportions of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung ST95 versus Zeiss ZX1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the ST95 vs the ZX1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the ST95 and ZX1 is 99 and 67 respectively.

Samsung ST95 vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ST95 and ZX1.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The ST95 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Zeiss ZX1 will produce greater detail because of its extra 21 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged ST95 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung ST95 vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung ST95 vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
Samsung ST95 | Zeiss ZX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Zeiss |
Model type | Samsung ST95 | Zeiss ZX1 |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-01-19 | 2018-09-27 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 37 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7488 x 4992 |
Max native ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | - | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 255 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2-22 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 4.34 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 2,765 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 800g (1.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | 512GB internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $145 | - |