Samsung TL205 vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Samsung TL205 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as PL100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung TL205 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Samsung TL205 versus Samsung WB800F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the TL205 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TL205 was manufactured 4 years before the WB800F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TL205 scores against the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung TL205 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung TL205 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are available at Samsung TL205 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Samsung WB800F
TL205 | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung TL205
WB800F | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 36 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung TL205 and Samsung WB800F
TL205 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Samsung TL205 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung TL205 has got outer measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Samsung TL205 versus Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the TL205 and the WB800F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TL205 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Samsung TL205 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TL205 and WB800F.
As you can see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to give more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older TL205 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung TL205 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung TL205 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Samsung TL205 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung TL205 | Samsung WB800F |
Also Known as | PL100 | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 177g (0.39 lb) | 218g (0.48 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $180 | $300 |