Clicky

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27
Samsung TL205 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
32
Overall
36

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Key Specs

Samsung TL205
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
  • 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Also Known as PL100
Sony W690
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 142g - 94 x 56 x 22mm
  • Launched February 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Samsung TL205 versus Sony W690, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the TL205 (12MP) and W690 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The TL205 was revealed 3 years earlier than the W690 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony W690 being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TL205 grades against the W690 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Sony W690

 TL205 W690 

Reasons to pick Sony W690 over the Samsung TL205

 W690 TL205 
LaunchedFebruary 2012January 2010More modern by 26 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Samsung TL205 and Sony W690

 TL205 W690 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Samsung TL205 features physical dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Sony W690 has specifications of 94mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).

See the Samsung TL205 versus Sony W690 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TL205 vs the W690.

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TL205 and W690 is 94 and 95 respectively.

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 top view buttons comparison

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing technical specs. The image underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TL205 and W690.

As you have seen, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony W690 to render greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TL205 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 sensor size comparison

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung TL205
Portrait photography with Sony W690
21
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
34
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Samsung TL205 Street photography features
Sony W690 Street photography features
47
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than average (177g)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Samsung TL205 Sports photography information
Sony W690 Sports photography information
25
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Samsung TL205 Travel photography advice
Sony W690 Travel photography advice
50
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than average (177g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
68
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
long reach (250mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung TL205
Landscape photography with Sony W690
23
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
43
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
no manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
manual mode not available
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung TL205 as a Vlogging camera
Sony W690 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than average (177 grams)
31
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung TL205 and Sony W690
 Samsung TL205Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690
General Information
Company Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung TL205 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690
Also Known as PL100 -
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-01-06 2012-02-28
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 25-250mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.6 f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing range 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - ClearPhoto TFT LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1500 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.40 m 3.30 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 177g (0.39 lbs) 142g (0.31 lbs)
Dimensions 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") 94 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Storage media MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $180 $297