Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27


95 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also Known as PL100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 56 x 22mm
- Launched February 2012

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Samsung TL205 versus Sony W690, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the TL205 (12MP) and W690 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The TL205 was revealed 3 years earlier than the W690 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony W690 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TL205 grades against the W690 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung TL205 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690. The full galleries are provided at Samsung TL205 Gallery & Sony W690 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Sony W690
TL205 | W690 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony W690 over the Samsung TL205
W690 | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 26 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Samsung TL205 and Sony W690
TL205 | W690 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Samsung TL205 features physical dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Sony W690 has specifications of 94mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Samsung TL205 versus Sony W690 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TL205 vs the W690.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TL205 and W690 is 94 and 95 respectively.

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing technical specs. The image underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TL205 and W690.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony W690 to render greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TL205 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung TL205 vs Sony W690 Specifications
Samsung TL205 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung TL205 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 |
Also Known as | PL100 | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.6 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 177g (0.39 lbs) | 142g (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 94 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $180 | $297 |