Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is PL150
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB800F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the TL210 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TL210 was introduced 4 years prior to the WB800F which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung TL210 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TL210 grades versus the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung TL210 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung TL210 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Samsung WB800F
| TL210 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung TL210
| WB800F | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung TL210 and Samsung WB800F
| TL210 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung TL210 comes with outer measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the TL210 compared to the WB800F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TL210 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The image here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TL210 and WB800F.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to produce greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged TL210 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung TL210 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung TL210 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung TL210 | Samsung WB800F |
| Otherwise known as | PL150 | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-135mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 177 gr (0.39 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-07B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $230 | $300 |