Samsung TL225 vs Sony A300
94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
64 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
Samsung TL225 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
- Additionally referred to as ST550
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2008
- New Model is Sony A330
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung TL225 vs Sony A300 Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Samsung TL225 vs Sony A300, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the TL225 (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is fairly similar but the TL225 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TL225 was revealed 19 months after the A300 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the TL225 matches up versus the A300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Samsung TL225 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung TL225 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The full galleries are provided at Samsung TL225 Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Sony A300
| TL225 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2009 | January 2008 | Newer by 19 months | |
| Display dimension | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
| Display resolution | 1152k | 230k | Clearer display (+922k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Samsung TL225
| A300 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Samsung TL225 and Sony A300
| TL225 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Samsung TL225 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung TL225 offers physical measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sony A300 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Check out the Samsung TL225 vs Sony A300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the TL225 compared to the A300.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the TL225 and A300 is 94 and 64 respectively.
Samsung TL225 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The image below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TL225 and A300.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TL225 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung TL225 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The newer TL225 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung TL225 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung TL225 vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Samsung TL225 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung TL225 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Also referred to as | ST550 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-08-13 | 2008-01-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 27-124mm (4.6x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,152k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 187 gr (0.41 lbs) | 632 gr (1.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-07A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $488 | $0 |