Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5000
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Released February 2012
- Succeeded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Refreshed by Sigma DP3 Merrill
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the TL240 (14MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is relatively similar but the TL240 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TL240 was brought out 3 years before the DP2 Merrill and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TL240 grades versus the DP2 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung TL240 and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The entire galleries are available at Samsung TL240 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
TL240 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Samsung TL240
DP2 Merrill | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | January 2010 | Fresher by 25 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung TL240 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
TL240 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung TL240 enjoys external dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the TL240 against the DP2 Merrill.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TL240 and DP2 Merrill is 95 and 83 respectively.
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TL240 and DP2 Merrill.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TL240 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will offer extra detail having its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older TL240 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Samsung TL240 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung TL240 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Also referred to as | ST5000 | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4334 x 3256 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 4800 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 640x480 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 160g (0.35 lbs) | 330g (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $171 | $931 |