Samsung TL240 vs Sigma SD9
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5000
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung TL240 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Samsung TL240 vs Sigma SD9, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the TL240 (14MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the TL240 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TL240 was revealed 7 years after the SD9 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TL240 grades versus the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung TL240 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung TL240 & Sigma SD9. The full galleries are available at Samsung TL240 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Sigma SD9
| TL240 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | November 2002 | More modern by 87 months |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.7") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 130k | Clearer display (+100k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung TL240
| SD9 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the Samsung TL240 and Sigma SD9
| TL240 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung TL240 provides physical measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Examine the Samsung TL240 vs Sigma SD9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TL240 vs the SD9.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TL240 and SD9 is 95 and 54 respectively.
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TL240 and SD9.
As you can see, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TL240 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung TL240 will resolve greater detail because of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger TL240 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung TL240 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Samsung TL240 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model type | Samsung TL240 | Sigma SD9 |
| Otherwise known as | ST5000 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2002-11-26 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4334 x 3256 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 4800 | 400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 1.8" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $171 | $3,001 |