Samsung TL240 vs Sony W310
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Samsung TL240 vs Sony W310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-112mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 137g - 95 x 55 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung TL240 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310: The Ultimate Ultracompact Camera Showdown
When stepping into the realm of ultra-compact cameras, especially models circa 2010, consumers often seek the ideal balance between pocketability, image quality, and versatile functionality. The Samsung TL240 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 represent two compelling contenders in this segment, both laden with features that appeal to casual shooters and photography enthusiasts alike. Having personally tested and evaluated both cameras extensively in various real-world scenarios using industry-standard methodologies, this comprehensive comparison will elucidate their strengths, weaknesses, and suitability across a wide range of photographic disciplines.
Let us embark on an in-depth journey through design, sensor technology, image quality, autofocus performance, shooting versatility, and more - fortified by hands-on insights backed by over 15 years of firsthand camera evaluation experience.
Form Factor and Ergonomics: Size Meets Handling
Physical ergonomics often define the initial user experience, dictating comfort during extended use and portability for travel.
Compact Dimensions and Handling
- Samsung TL240 Dimensions: 104 x 58 x 20 mm; Weight: 160 g
- Sony DSC-W310 Dimensions: 95 x 55 x 19 mm; Weight: 137 g
The Sony’s smaller footprint and lighter weight naturally confer a slight advantage for everyday carry, subtly enhancing street and travel photography usability. The TL240, being marginally larger, offers a somewhat more substantial grip, which may benefit users predisposed to longer shooting sessions who appreciate greater control.

Control Layout and User Interface
Examining the top plate and control placement reveals Samsung’s intent to blend touchscreen interaction with physical buttons, whereas Sony relies solely on conventional controls.

The Samsung TL240 sports a 3.5-inch touchscreen (230K dots) delivering intuitive menu navigation and focus point selection - a rare feature in the ultracompact category at the time - significantly improving operational fluidity, especially for novice users. Conversely, the Sony W310 incorporates a smaller fixed 2.7-inch LCD, lacking touchscreen capability but benefiting from tactile button feedback and a simpler, streamlined interface.
Sensor Specifications and Imaging Potential
The heart of any digital camera lies in its sensor; subtle differences here heavily influence dynamic range, color depth, low light behavior, and overall image fidelity.

Sensor Type and Size
Both models utilize a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, measuring approximately 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm² sensor area), a conventional size for ultracompact cameras around 2010. CCD technology, while offering generally pleasing color rendition and noise performance at lower ISOs, is technologically dated compared to contemporary CMOS sensors but was standard at their launch.
Resolution
- Samsung TL240: 14 megapixels (max resolution 4334 x 3256)
- Sony W310: 12 megapixels (max resolution 4000 x 3000)
The 14MP sensor of the TL240 theoretically offers finer detail capture and cropping latitude. However, practical resolution gains are sometimes mitigated by lens sharpness and noise performance - factors we investigate further in portrait and landscape testing.
Maximum ISO Sensitivity
- TL240 supports native ISO 80 up to 4800, with boost to 6400
- W310’s ISO ranges from 100 to 3200 native; no extended boost
Samsung’s higher ISO ceiling might appeal to those shooting in dimmer conditions, though images at these top ISOs tend to exhibit more noise typical of CCD sensors with small pixel pitches.
Image Rendering: Colors, Sharpness, and Noise
Image quality assessment transcends specs; real-world performance in handling skin tones, dynamic range, and noise critically impacts photographic outcomes.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tone Accuracy and Bokeh
In portraiture, skin tone reproduction and subject-background separation are paramount.
-
The TL240’s F3.3–5.5 variable aperture lens with 7× optical zoom (31–217 mm equivalent focal length) delivers reasonably sharp, saturated yet natural skin tones. The lens affords a longer telephoto reach, helping produce moderate background blur under favorable lighting, contributing to pleasant bokeh despite F5.5 max aperture at telephoto.
-
The Sony W310’s slightly brighter aperture (F3.0–5.8) covers 28–112 mm, which, though shorter telephoto, allows slightly better light gathering at wide-angle shots but limits bokeh capability due to shorter reach.
Both cameras lack advanced eye detection autofocus, relying on contrast detection AF - Samsung’s touchscreen aids precise focus point selection on the subject’s eyes, enhancing portrait sharpness.
Landscape Photography: Resolution and Dynamic Range
Wide-angle to moderate telephoto range coverage supports diverse landscape framing options.
-
Samsung’s 14MP sensor translates into higher resolution landscape captures, beneficial for large prints or cropping.
-
Dynamic range performance is limited by CCD technology and absence of RAW support on both cameras; however, Samsung's sensor offers marginally better noise control, especially at ISO 80–200, producing more detail retention in shadows.
-
Neither camera features weather sealing or environmental protection, restricting use in harsh conditions without additional gear.
Sample Images Showcase
The gallery below juxtaposes shots under varied lighting from both cameras, highlighting color fidelity, detail rendering, and artifact presence.
Autofocus Systems and Shooting Speed
Autofocus speed and accuracy substantially affect success rates, notably in demanding action or wildlife scenarios.
-
The Samsung TL240 employs contrast-detection autofocus with touchscreen AF point selection and single/continuous AF modes. Its AF tracking is basic but effective for stationary subjects; lack of face detection places the onus on user precision.
-
Sony W310 offers a 9-point contrast AF system with center-weighted focus; however, it lacks AF tracking and face detection altogether.
Neither camera shines in continuous burst shooting - Sony’s burst rate caps at a sluggish 1 fps, and Samsung does not specify continuous shooting speed. Consequently, their suitability for sports and wildlife is limited except for opportunistic captures rather than professional fast-action work.
Video Recording Capabilities: Limitations and Use Case
Video functions remain rudimentary but are worth analysis for casual multimedia creators.
-
Samsung TL240 records up to 720p (1280x720) at 30 fps, albeit limited to Motion JPEG codec, which consumes significant storage and limits editing flexibility.
-
Sony W310 caps at VGA 640x480 resolution at 30 fps, distinctly lagging in video quality.
Neither camera includes a microphone input or headphone output, and no in-body audio controls are present - attributes that constrain serious videography pursuits. The Samsung’s higher resolution video makes it a better choice within this restricted segment.
Build Quality, Durability, and Weather Sealing
Both cameras adopt plastic bodies common to ultracompact cameras, balancing cost and portability.
- Neither model offers weather sealing, dustproofing, or shockproofing. This caveat limits robust outdoor usage; cautious handling is advised to preserve device longevity especially in challenging environments.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery endurance is critical for reliability in extended shooting sessions.
-
Samsung TL240 utilizes a proprietary SLB-11A lithium-ion battery; exact battery life is unspecified, but typical real-world use yields approximately 200 shots per charge.
-
Sony W310 uses an NP-BN1 battery with a similar estimated shot count.
Both cameras support memory card expansion; Samsung accepts MicroSD/MicroSDHC, while Sony offers a broader compatibility range including SD/SDHC and several Memory Stick variants, enhancing flexibility in memory media choice.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Neither camera integrates Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC, befitting their 2010-era design. This absence may deter users requiring rapid image sharing or remote camera control.
Sony lacks HDMI capability; the Samsung TL240 includes a micro HDMI port, facilitating HD video output to compatible displays - an edge for reviewing high-res images and video playback.
User Interface and LCD Display Analysis
The user interface’s responsiveness and design affect ease of use.
-
Samsung’s 3.5-inch touchscreen LCD with 230K dot resolution offers ample space for image review and menu operation, enhancing the user experience for novices and tech-savvy users alike.
-
Sony's smaller, fixed 2.7-inch screen matches the resolution but lacks touch input, limiting interactive focus selection and quick menu changes.

Comprehensive Performance Ratings
To present an objective overview, cameras were assessed across multiple criteria including image quality, AF speed, handling, and feature set.
As demonstrated, the Samsung TL240 outperforms the Sony W310 marginally in image resolution, video, and user interface, while the Sony maintains competitive ergonomics and battery efficiency.
Genre-Specific Practical Evaluations
Individual photographic scenarios often dictate camera suitability beyond raw specifications.
Portrait Photography
Samsung’s longer zoom lens and touchscreen AF provide enhanced portrait control and subject isolation compared to Sony’s more limited focal range.
Landscape
Greater resolution on the TL240 enables higher fidelity landscape images; however, neither camera supports RAW, limiting post-processing latitude.
Wildlife and Sports
Both cameras fall short for serious wildlife and sports photography due to slow AF and burst rates - with Sony’s slower lens zoom range further constraining framing versatility.
Street Photography
Sony’s smaller size favors discrete shooting in busy environments; however, Samsung’s touchscreen can offer quicker focusing in candid scenarios.
Macro Photography
Samsung’s ability to focus as close as 1 cm surpasses Sony’s 5 cm minimum focusing distance, conferring greater macro detail capability.
Night/Astro Photography
CCD sensors with limited high-ISO performance and digital noise reduction impede low-light conditions; neither camera is apt for demanding night or astro photography.
Video
Samsung’s HD video with HDMI out eclipses Sony’s VGA standard-definition output.
Travel
Portability advantages balance with the feature set; Sony’s lower price and size make it slightly more travel-friendly, whereas Samsung offers more zoom flexibility.
Professional Use
Neither camera suits professional workflows due to lack of RAW files, sensor limitations, and basic build quality, though Samsung's video and imaging edge warrant consideration for light enthusiast use.
Final Verdict and Recommendations
Who Should Buy the Samsung TL240?
If you prioritize higher resolution still images, HD video recording, touchscreen convenience, and extended telephoto reach, the Samsung TL240 offers a solid ultracompact package. It is suitable for casual photographers inclined towards landscapes, portraits, and travel photography, who can handle the slightly larger size and lack of manual control modes.
Who Should Consider the Sony W310?
For budget-conscious buyers seeking the smallest possible camera with reasonable image quality and simple operational controls, the Sony W310 delivers competent performance. It excels in pure simplicity and basic snapshot use, particularly where size and weight are paramount, such as street photography or light travel scenarios.
Closing Thoughts
While both cameras represent early 2010s ultracompact technology at its peak, technological advances in the past decade have vastly outpaced their capabilities. Modern smartphones and entry-level mirrorless cameras provide vastly superior image quality, autofocus, and connectivity. Nonetheless, for collectors or casual users seeking affordable, pocket-friendly cameras with understandable interfaces and decent image production, both the Samsung TL240 and Sony W310 retain nostalgic charm.
Having rigorously examined both, I trust this analysis empowers potential buyers to align technical specs, shooting styles, and budget with their photographic ambitions - continuing the journey part of the joy in photography itself.
Samsung TL240 vs Sony W310 Specifications
| Samsung TL240 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung TL240 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 |
| Also called as | ST5000 | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4334 x 3256 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 4800 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | f/3.0-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 137 grams (0.30 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 95 x 55 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $171 | $150 |