Samsung TL240 vs Sony A33
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Portability
67 Imaging
53 Features
80 Overall
63
67 Imaging
53 Features
80 Overall
63
Samsung TL240 vs Sony A33 Key Specs
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5000
Sony A33
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Released August 2010
- Renewed by Sony A35
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung TL240 vs Sony A33 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Samsung TL240 vs Sony A33, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the TL240 (14MP) and the A33 (14MP) is very well matched but the TL240 (1/2.3") and A33 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TL240 was manufactured 7 months before the A33 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A33 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TL240 matches up vs the A33 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung TL240 vs Sony A33 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung TL240 & Sony SLT-A33. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung TL240 Gallery & Sony A33 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Sony A33
| TL240 | A33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Samsung TL240
| A33 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung TL240 and Sony A33
| TL240 | A33 |
|---|
Samsung TL240 vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung TL240 has exterior dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony A33 has proportions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Compare the Samsung TL240 vs Sony A33 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the TL240 compared to the A33.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TL240 and A33 is 95 and 67 respectively.
Samsung TL240 vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at specs. The photograph below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TL240 and A33.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with the identical resolution but different sensor sizing. The TL240 includes the tinier sensor which will make obtaining bokeh harder. The older TL240 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung TL240 vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung TL240 Portrait photography details
Sony A33 Portrait photography details
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
focusing manually
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung TL240 Street photography details
Sony A33 Street photography details
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch focus
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than competition (160g)
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung TL240 Sports photography advice
Sony A33 Sports photography advice
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (14MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect AF
terrible battery life (340 per charge)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung TL240 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A33 as a Travel photography camera
provides touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (160 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
missing Time Lapse recording
terrible battery life (340 per charge)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Samsung TL240
Landscape photography with Sony A33
very good size screen (3.5 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual mode not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
terrible battery life (340 per charge)
missing Time Lapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung TL240 Vlogging information
Sony A33 Vlogging information
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than competition (160g)
selfie friendly display
image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with external mic support
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Samsung TL240 vs Sony A33 Specifications
| Samsung TL240 | Sony SLT-A33 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung TL240 | Sony SLT-A33 |
| Also Known as | ST5000 | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2010-08-24 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4334 x 3256 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 4800 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) | 500 grams (1.10 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 591 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $171 | $230 |