Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB35F
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Samsung TL320 versus Samsung WB35F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the TL320 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TL320 was introduced 5 years prior to the WB35F and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the TL320 scores vs the WB35F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung TL320 and Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are available at Samsung TL320 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Samsung WB35F
TL320 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Samsung TL320
WB35F | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | February 2009 | Fresher by 59 months |
Common features in the Samsung TL320 and Samsung WB35F
TL320 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung TL320 has got external dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Samsung TL320 versus Samsung WB35F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TL320 vs the WB35F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TL320 and WB35F is 98 and 93 respectively.
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TL320 and WB35F.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB35F to show more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older TL320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Samsung TL320 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung TL320 | Samsung WB35F |
Also called as | WB1000 | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-02-23 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $380 | $130 |