Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB50F
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally Known as WB1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Samsung TL320 versus Samsung WB50F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the TL320 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TL320 was revealed 5 years prior to the WB50F which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the TL320 grades versus the WB50F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung TL320 and Samsung WB50F. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung TL320 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Samsung WB50F
| TL320 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Samsung TL320
| WB50F | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 59 months |
Common features in the Samsung TL320 and Samsung WB50F
| TL320 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Samsung TL320 has external dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung TL320 versus Samsung WB50F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the TL320 and the WB50F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TL320 and WB50F is 98 and 92 respectively.
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The image here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TL320 and WB50F.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB50F to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged TL320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung TL320 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Samsung TL320 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung TL320 | Samsung WB50F |
| Also referred to as | WB1000 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-02-23 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 207g (0.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $380 | $180 |
