Samsung TL320 vs Sony NEX-3N
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
89 Imaging
56 Features
52 Overall
54
Samsung TL320 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-F3
- Successor is Sony a5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung TL320 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Its time to look closer at the Samsung TL320 versus Sony NEX-3N, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Samsung and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the TL320 (12MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the TL320 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TL320 was introduced 5 years before the NEX-3N which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the TL320 scores vs the NEX-3N in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung TL320 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung TL320 and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung TL320 Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Sony NEX-3N
| TL320 | NEX-3N |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Samsung TL320
| NEX-3N | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2013 | February 2009 | More modern by 48 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Samsung TL320 and Sony NEX-3N
| TL320 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Samsung TL320 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung TL320 has outside measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony NEX-3N has dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung TL320 versus Sony NEX-3N in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the TL320 compared to the NEX-3N.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TL320 and NEX-3N is 98 and 89 respectively.
Samsung TL320 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The image here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TL320 and NEX-3N.
Clearly, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TL320 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-3N will render extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged TL320 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung TL320 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung TL320 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
| Samsung TL320 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung TL320 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
| Also called as | WB1000 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2009-02-23 | 2013-02-25 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.8 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1067 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 480 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $380 | $399 |