Samsung TL320 vs Sony HX300
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
63 Imaging
43 Features
51 Overall
46
Samsung TL320 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Older Model is Sony HX200V
- Replacement is Sony HX400V
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung TL320 vs Sony HX300 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Samsung TL320 vs Sony HX300, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TL320 (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TL320 was released 5 years earlier than the HX300 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the TL320 grades against the HX300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung TL320 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung TL320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The complete galleries are available at Samsung TL320 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Sony HX300
| TL320 | HX300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Samsung TL320
| HX300 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2013 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 48 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung TL320 and Sony HX300
| TL320 | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Samsung TL320 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung TL320 comes with external dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check the Samsung TL320 vs Sony HX300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the TL320 and the HX300.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TL320 and HX300 is 98 and 63 respectively.
Samsung TL320 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TL320 and HX300.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony HX300 to provide more detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older TL320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung TL320 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung TL320 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Samsung TL320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung TL320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Other name | WB1000 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-02-23 | 2013-02-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.8 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 623g (1.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $380 | $339 |