Samsung TL350 vs Sigma SD9
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Samsung TL350 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Additionally Known as WB2000
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Samsung TL350 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Samsung TL350 versus Sigma SD9, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the TL350 (10MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the TL350 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TL350 was manufactured 7 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the TL350 scores against the SD9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung TL350 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung TL350 & Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are available at Samsung TL350 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Sigma SD9
TL350 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2010 | November 2002 | Fresher by 89 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 130k | Sharper screen (+790k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung TL350
SD9 | TL350 |
---|
Common features in the Samsung TL350 and Sigma SD9
TL350 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Samsung TL350 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Samsung TL350 features outer measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Look at the Samsung TL350 versus Sigma SD9 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the TL350 against the SD9.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TL350 and SD9 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Samsung TL350 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The visual below will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TL350 and SD9.
All in all, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TL350 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung TL350 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher TL350 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung TL350 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung TL350 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Samsung TL350 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung TL350 | Sigma SD9 |
Also called as | WB2000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2010-02-20 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 3MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.4-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 1.8" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 130k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 195 grams (0.43 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $400 | $3,001 |