Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX100 VI
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
88 Imaging
54 Features
75 Overall
62
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX100 VI Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternative Name is WB2000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 301g - 102 x 58 x 43mm
- Released June 2018
- Earlier Model is Sony RX100 V
- Refreshed by Sony RX100 VII
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX100 VI Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Samsung TL350 versus Sony RX100 VI, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the TL350 (10MP) and RX100 VI (20MP) and the TL350 (1/2.3") and RX100 VI (1") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TL350 was introduced 9 years earlier than the RX100 VI and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 VI being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the TL350 matches up vs the RX100 VI in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX100 VI Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung TL350 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung TL350 Gallery and Sony RX100 VI Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Sony RX100 VI
TL350 | RX100 VI |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VI over the Samsung TL350
RX100 VI | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2018 | February 2010 | More recent by 100 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 920k | Sharper display (+309k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung TL350 and Sony RX100 VI
TL350 | RX100 VI | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX100 VI Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung TL350 enjoys physical dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 VI has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") having a weight of 301 grams (0.66 lbs).
See the Samsung TL350 versus Sony RX100 VI in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the TL350 compared to the RX100 VI.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TL350 and RX100 VI is 94 and 88 respectively.
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX100 VI Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TL350 and RX100 VI.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TL350 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony RX100 VI will give more detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older TL350 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX100 VI Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX100 VI Specifications
Samsung TL350 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung TL350 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI |
Also called as | WB2000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-02-20 | 2018-06-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.4-5.8 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 5.90 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 195 grams (0.43 lbs) | 301 grams (0.66 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $400 | $1,198 |