Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX1R II
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
78 Imaging
76 Features
65 Overall
71
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB2000
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Revealed October 2015
- Replaced the Sony RX1R
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX1R II Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX1R II, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the TL350 (10MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the TL350 (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TL350 was released 6 years earlier than the RX1R II which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the TL350 scores versus the RX1R II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX1R II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung TL350 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung TL350 Gallery and Sony RX1R II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Sony RX1R II
TL350 | RX1R II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Samsung TL350
RX1R II | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2015 | February 2010 | More modern by 68 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 920k | Crisper display (+309k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung TL350 and Sony RX1R II
TL350 | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung TL350 provides external measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony RX1R II has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") with a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX1R II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the TL350 and the RX1R II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TL350 and RX1R II is 94 and 78 respectively.
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The pic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TL350 and RX1R II.
As you can tell, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TL350 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony RX1R II will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 32 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TL350 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung TL350 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
Samsung TL350 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung TL350 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
Otherwise known as | WB2000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-02-20 | 2015-10-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 42MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.4-5.8 | f/2.0 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 14cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 195 gr (0.43 lb) | 507 gr (1.12 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 97 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3204 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $400 | $3,300 |