Samsung TL350 vs Zeiss ZX1
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
67 Imaging
77 Features
62 Overall
71
Samsung TL350 vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Also referred to as WB2000
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Introduced September 2018
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung TL350 vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Samsung TL350 vs Zeiss ZX1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Zeiss. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the TL350 (10MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the TL350 (1/2.3") and ZX1 (Full frame) enjoy different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TL350 was manufactured 9 years prior to the ZX1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the TL350 scores against the ZX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung TL350 vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung TL350 & Zeiss ZX1. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung TL350 Gallery & Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Zeiss ZX1
| TL350 | ZX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Samsung TL350
| ZX1 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2018 | February 2010 | Newer by 104 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen sizing | 4.34" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.34") | |
| Screen resolution | 2765k | 920k | Sharper screen (+1845k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung TL350 and Zeiss ZX1
| TL350 | ZX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Samsung TL350 vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung TL350 features outside dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Zeiss ZX1 has dimensions of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung TL350 vs Zeiss ZX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the TL350 compared to the ZX1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TL350 and ZX1 is 94 and 67 respectively.
Samsung TL350 vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking a spec sheet. The image here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TL350 and ZX1.
Clearly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TL350 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Zeiss ZX1 will give you extra detail due to its extra 27 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged TL350 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung TL350 vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung TL350 vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
| Samsung TL350 | Zeiss ZX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Zeiss |
| Model | Samsung TL350 | Zeiss ZX1 |
| Also Known as | WB2000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-02-20 | 2018-09-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 37MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 7488 x 4992 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 255 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.4-5.8 | f/2-22 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 4.34 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 2,765k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195g (0.43 lbs) | 800g (1.76 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-11A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, internal | 512GB internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $400 | - |