Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB50F
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Announced July 2010
- Additionally referred to as EX1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Samsung TL500 versus Samsung WB50F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the TL500 (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the TL500 (1/1.7") and WB50F (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TL500 was brought out 4 years prior to the WB50F and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TL500 scores versus the WB50F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung TL500 and Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung TL500 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Samsung WB50F
TL500 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper screen (+154k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Samsung TL500
WB50F | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | July 2010 | Fresher by 42 months |
Common features in the Samsung TL500 and Samsung WB50F
TL500 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung TL500 offers physical dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Samsung TL500 versus Samsung WB50F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the TL500 versus the WB50F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TL500 and WB50F is 88 and 92 respectively.
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TL500 and WB50F.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TL500 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung WB50F will render extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older TL500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Samsung TL500 | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung TL500 | Samsung WB50F |
Also Known as | EX1 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-07-09 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.4 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 614k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 386 grams (0.85 lb) | 207 grams (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 40 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 129 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | SLB-07A | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $527 | $180 |