Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB800F
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Launched July 2010
- Additionally referred to as EX1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Samsung TL500 versus Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the TL500 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the TL500 (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TL500 was launched 3 years prior to the WB800F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TL500 scores vs the WB800F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung TL500 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung TL500 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Samsung WB800F
| TL500 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+154k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung TL500
| WB800F | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 30 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung TL500 and Samsung WB800F
| TL500 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung TL500 provides outer measurements of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Samsung TL500 versus Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the TL500 and the WB800F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TL500 and WB800F is 88 and 92 respectively.
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TL500 and WB800F.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TL500 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Samsung WB800F will render more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The older TL500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung TL500 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung TL500 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung TL500 | Samsung WB800F |
| Also called as | EX1 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-07-09 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.4 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 386 grams (0.85 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 40 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 19.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 129 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-07A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $527 | $300 |