Samsung TL500 vs Sony RX10 III
88 Imaging
33 Features
54 Overall
41
53 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Samsung TL500 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Other Name is EX1
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Revealed March 2016
- Replaced the Sony RX10 II
- Successor is Sony RX10 IV
Photography Glossary Samsung TL500 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Samsung TL500 versus Sony RX10 III, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the TL500 (10MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the TL500 (1/1.7") and RX10 III (1") offer different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TL500 was launched 6 years before the RX10 III and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the TL500 matches up versus the RX10 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung TL500 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung TL500 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The complete galleries are available at Samsung TL500 Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Sony RX10 III
| TL500 | RX10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Samsung TL500
| RX10 III | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2016 | July 2010 | Fresher by 69 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1229k | 614k | Crisper screen (+615k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung TL500 and Sony RX10 III
| TL500 | RX10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Samsung TL500 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung TL500 has outside measurements of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Examine the Samsung TL500 versus Sony RX10 III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TL500 against the RX10 III.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TL500 and RX10 III is 88 and 53 respectively.
Samsung TL500 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by reading specs. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TL500 and RX10 III.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TL500 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sony RX10 III will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older TL500 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung TL500 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung TL500 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
| Samsung TL500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung TL500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
| Also called | EX1 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-07-09 | 2016-03-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.4 | f/2.4-4.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 14.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 386 grams (0.85 lb) | 1051 grams (2.32 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 40 | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 19.2 | 23.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.1 | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | 129 | 472 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 420 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-07A | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $527 | $1,398 |