Samsung TL500 vs Sony T900
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Samsung TL500 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternate Name is EX1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Samsung TL500 vs Sony T900 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Samsung TL500 vs Sony T900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the TL500 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the TL500 (1/1.7") and T900 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TL500 was unveiled 17 months later than the T900 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TL500 scores vs the T900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung TL500 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung TL500 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are provided at Samsung TL500 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Sony T900
TL500 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | February 2009 | More recent by 17 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung TL500
T900 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 614k | Clearer display (+308k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung TL500 and Sony T900
TL500 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Samsung TL500 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung TL500 has outside dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Samsung TL500 vs Sony T900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the TL500 compared to the T900.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TL500 and T900 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Samsung TL500 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The visual underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TL500 and T900.
To sum up, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TL500 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony T900 will give you extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern TL500 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung TL500 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung TL500 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Samsung TL500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung TL500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Also Known as | EX1 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-07-09 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.4 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 614k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 2 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 386 grams (0.85 lbs) | 143 grams (0.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 40 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 19.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 129 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-07A | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $527 | $300 |