Samsung WB1100F vs Sony TX200V
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
96 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
Samsung WB1100F vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung WB1100F vs Sony TX200V Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Samsung WB1100F and Sony TX200V, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB1100F (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is pretty well matched and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WB1100F was brought out 24 months later than the TX200V which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WB1100F grades against the TX200V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB1100F vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB1100F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB1100F Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Sony TX200V
| WB1100F | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Samsung WB1100F
| TX200V | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.3" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB1100F and Sony TX200V
| WB1100F | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Samsung WB1100F vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB1100F enjoys physical dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") accompanied by a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB1100F and Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WB1100F vs the TX200V.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WB1100F and TX200V is 67 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB1100F vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The photograph here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB1100F and TX200V.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Sony TX200V to resolve more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern WB1100F will have an edge in sensor tech.
Samsung WB1100F vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung WB1100F vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Samsung WB1100F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB1100F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2012-01-30 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-875mm (35.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 512g (1.13 lb) | 129g (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-BN |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $250 | $500 |