Clicky

Samsung WB150F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
42
Overall
39
Samsung WB150F front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Samsung WB150F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Samsung WB150F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Samsung WB150F and Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sigma. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the WB150F (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the WB150F (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The WB150F was introduced 3 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the WB150F scores versus the DP2 Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 WB150F DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Samsung WB150F

 DP2 Quattro WB150F 
RevealedFebruary 2014January 2012Newer by 25 months
Display resolution920k460kClearer display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB150F and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 WB150F DP2 Quattro 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Samsung WB150F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB150F provides exterior measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check out the Samsung WB150F and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the WB150F and the DP2 Quattro.

Samsung WB150F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WB150F and DP2 Quattro is 93 and 70 respectively.

Samsung WB150F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB150F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The picture below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB150F and DP2 Quattro.

As you can see, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WB150F with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will result in more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged WB150F will be behind in sensor tech.

Samsung WB150F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Samsung WB150F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB150F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB150F as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
42
you can focus manually
good megapixels (14MP)
has face detect focusing
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
77
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Samsung WB150F Street photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography advice
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (188g)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
61
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB150F Sports photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography features
51
excellent zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
48
megapixel count decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB150F Travel photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography factors
69
lighter than others in class (188g)
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long reach (432mm)
missing Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
53
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB150F Landscape photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography factors
49
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse function
59
you can focus manually
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB150F Vlogging highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging highlights
32
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
lighter than others in class (188 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone jack
9
no video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung WB150F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB150F and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Samsung WB150FSigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung WB150F Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2012-01-09 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-432mm (18.0x) 45mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.8 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 16 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.50 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 188 gr (0.41 lbs) 395 gr (0.87 lbs)
Physical dimensions 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID SLB-10A BP-51
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $230 $931