Samsung WB150F vs Sony A300
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
64 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
Samsung WB150F vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released January 2008
- Updated by Sony A330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB150F vs Sony A300 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Samsung WB150F versus Sony A300, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the WB150F (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the WB150F (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB150F was launched 4 years later than the A300 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WB150F matches up vs the A300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB150F vs Sony A300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB150F and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The complete galleries are available at Samsung WB150F Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Sony A300
| WB150F | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 | January 2008 | More recent by 48 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Samsung WB150F
| A300 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Samsung WB150F and Sony A300
| WB150F | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Samsung WB150F vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB150F has got outside dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Sony A300 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Examine the Samsung WB150F versus Sony A300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the WB150F against the A300.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB150F and A300 is 93 and 64 respectively.
Samsung WB150F vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB150F and A300.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB150F featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Samsung WB150F will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher WB150F should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung WB150F vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung WB150F vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Samsung WB150F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB150F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2008-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 188 gr (0.41 pounds) | 632 gr (1.39 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $230 | $0 |