Samsung WB150F vs Sony HX200V
Portability
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Portability
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Samsung WB150F vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Announced May 2012
- Superseded the Sony HX100V
- New Model is Sony HX300
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung WB150F vs Sony HX200V Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Samsung WB150F vs Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the WB150F (14MP) and HX200V (18MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WB150F was introduced 4 months prior to the HX200V which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the WB150F matches up versus the HX200V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB150F vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB150F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung WB150F Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Sony HX200V
| WB150F | HX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Samsung WB150F
| HX200V | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB150F and Sony HX200V
| WB150F | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | May 2012 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Samsung WB150F vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB150F comes with outer measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB150F vs Sony HX200V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WB150F and the HX200V.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB150F and HX200V is 93 and 66 respectively.
Samsung WB150F vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specs. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WB150F and HX200V.
All in all, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Sony HX200V to show more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.
Samsung WB150F vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Samsung WB150F
Portrait photography with Sony HX200V
you can focus manually
MP count decent (14MP)
supports face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has manual focus
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
features face detection focusing
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Samsung WB150F Street photography highlights
Sony HX200V Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (188 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (583g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Samsung WB150F
Sports photography with Sony HX200V
amazing zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
supports tracking focus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
better than average battery (450 per charge)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung WB150F Travel photography factors
Sony HX200V Travel photography factors
lighter than competitors (188 grams)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (432mm)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
better than average battery (450 shots)
MP count decent (18MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (27mm)
great zoom (810mm)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (583g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Samsung WB150F
Landscape photography with Sony HX200V
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
has manual focus
reasonably wide (27mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
better than average battery (450 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung WB150F Vlogging information
Sony HX200V Vlogging information
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
lighter than competitors (188 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone port
reasonably wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (583 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung WB150F vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Samsung WB150F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB150F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-09 | 2012-05-11 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 12.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 188 gr (0.41 pounds) | 583 gr (1.29 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 450 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $230 | $480 |