Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX100 VA
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39

/Sony-RX100-VA-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX100 VA Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Revealed July 2018

Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX100 VA Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX100 VA, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the WB150F (14MP) and RX100 VA (20MP) and the WB150F (1/2.3") and RX100 VA (1") boast different sensor dimensions.

The WB150F was manufactured 7 years earlier than the RX100 VA and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 VA being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WB150F grades versus the RX100 VA in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX100 VA Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB150F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A). The entire galleries are available at Samsung WB150F Gallery and Sony RX100 VA Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Sony RX100 VA
WB150F | RX100 VA |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VA over the Samsung WB150F
RX100 VA | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2018 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 79 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB150F and Sony RX100 VA
WB150F | RX100 VA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX100 VA Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Samsung WB150F provides physical dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 VA has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Examine the Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX100 VA in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the WB150F against the RX100 VA.
-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WB150F and RX100 VA is 93 and 89 respectively.
-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX100 VA Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB150F and RX100 VA.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WB150F because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sony RX100 VA will offer greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older WB150F is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and ViewFinder
-screen-back-comparison.jpg)

Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB150F vs Sony RX100 VA Specifications
Samsung WB150F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB150F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-01-09 | 2018-07-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 24.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 188g (0.41 lbs) | 299g (0.66 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $230 | $998 |